Struktura i percepcja krajobrazu turystycznego Zwierzyńca

Ewa Skowronek; Andrzej Tucki; Marta Jóźwik

doi:10.56583/br.983

Published : 2015-02-23

Vol. 12 No. 4 (2014)

The Structure and Perception of Tourist Landscape in Zwierzyniec

Ewa Skowronek

Andrzej Tucki

Marta Jóźwik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.983

Abstract

Due to the outstanding qualities of the natural environment and the exquisite cultural heritage, Zwierzyniec is one of the most famous and most popular tourist towns in the Roztocze region. The traditions of Zwierzyniec as a holiday resort were derived from the 16th century, when the countryside residence of Zamoyski family was established. Throughout the next centuries the town was also an administrative and industrial center, which impacted on further stages of the development of its landscape. However, the ongoing economic activities did not contribute to the disruption of the space layout of the town. Nowadays, the attractiveness of Zwierzyniec is mainly based on the unique natural landscape, which results from the location on the border of two different sub-regions — the Western Roztocze made of loess and the Middle Roztocze made of lime-sandy as well as the presence of picturesque valleys of Wieprz and Świerszcz rivers, the Echo ponds, the Rudka Haff and surroundings of Kosobudy and Zwierzyniec forests (under legal protection as Roztoczański National Park since 1974). All of above mentioned components influence the development of the tourist function of the town, which is reflected by its typical landscape. It involves assets and attractions as well as necessary tourist facilities, which arouse interest and arrivals, which reached 100 thousand visitors every year. The following article contains an analysis of the components of a tourist landscape based on the case study of Zwierzyniec as well as a study on its perception by residents and tourists.

Keywords:

tourist landscape, landscape perception, Roztocze region, Zwierzyniec

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Andrzej Tucki, Film Tourism. Concepts and Research Issue , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: Vol. 14 No. 2 (2016)

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Skowronek, E., Tucki, A., & Jóźwik, M. (2015). The Structure and Perception of Tourist Landscape in Zwierzyniec. Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses, 12(4), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.56583/br.983

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Aitchison C., MacLeod N.E., Shaw S.J. (2000): Leisure and Tourism Landscapes. Social and Cultural Geographies. London — New York, Routledge.

Chrenka B., Ira V. (2011): Transformation of Tourist Landscapes in Mountain Areas: Case Studies from Slovakia. „Human Geographies – Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography”, nr 5(2), s. 13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5719/hgeo.2011.52.13

Dietvorst A. (1998): Tourist Landscapes. Accelerating Transformations. [w:] S. Scraton (red.): Leisure, Time and Space. Meanings and Values in People’s Lives, LSA publication, t. 57, Eastbourne, Leisure Studies Association.

Ferrario F. (1978): The Tourist Landscape. A Method of Evaluating Tourist Potential and its Application to South Africa. „Dissertation Abstracts International”, nr 38(8), s. 5050.

Fyhri A., Jacobsen J.K.S., Tommervik H. (2009): Tourists’ Landscape Perceptions and Preferences in a Scandinavian Coastal Region. „Landscape and Urban Planning”, nr 91(4), s. 202–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.01.002

Gkoltsiou K., Terkenli T.S. (2008): Landscape Indicators: a Promising Tool For the Analysis of Tourist Landscape Structure. Studying, Modeling and Sense Making of Planet Earth, 1–6 June, 2008, Mytilene, Lesvos, Greece.

Healy R.G. (1994): The Common Pool Problem in Tourism Landscapes. „Annals of Tourism Research”, nr 21(3), s. 596–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(94)90122-8

Jafari J. (1982): The Tourism Market Basket of Goods and Services. The Components and Nature of Tourism. [w:] T. Singh, K. Jagdish i D.P. Singh (red.): Studies in Tourism, Wildlife Parks Conservation, New Delhi, Metropolitan.

Kowalczyk A., Derek M. (2010): Zagospodarowanie turystyczne. Turystyka, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Krukowska R., Jóźwik M.J. (2004): Walory turystyczne Zwierzyńca i okolic. [w:] R. Dobrowolski i S. Terpiłowski (red.): Stan i zmiany środowiska geograficznego wybranych regionów wschodniej Polski, Lublin, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.

Krukowska R., Świeca A. (2006): The Role of the Zamoyski Entailed Estate in Creation the Functions and Cultural Landscape of Zwierzyniec. [w:] E. Skowronek (red.): Cultural Landscapes of the Lublin Upland and Roztocze, Lublin, Kartpol.

Lozato-Giotart J.-P. (1993): Géographie du tourisme de l’espace regardé à l’espace consommé. Collection géographie, Paris Milan Barcelone, Masson.

Myga-Piątek U. (2012): Krajobrazy kulturowe. Aspekty ewolucyjne i typologiczne. Katowice, Pracownia Komputerowa Jacka Skalmierskiego.

Richling A. (2010): O krajobrazie raz jeszcze. Czy istnieją krajobrazy rekreacyjne? [w:] A. Richling (red.): Krajobrazy rekreacyjne. Kształtowanie, wykorzystanie, transformacja, Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, t. 27, Biała Podlaska–Warszawa, Państwowa Szkoła Wyższa im. Papieża Jana Pawła II; Polska Asocjacja Ekologii Krajobrazu.

Skowronek E., Jóźwik M.J., Tucki A. (2013): Krajobraz turystyczny – koncepcja teoretyczna. [w:] R. Wiluś i J. Wojciechowska (red.): Nowe-stare formy turystyki w przestrzeni, Warsztaty z Geografii Turyzmu, t. 3, Łódź, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/7525-925-4.06

Terkenli T.S. (2002): Landscapes of Tourism. Towards a Global Cultural Economy of Space? „Tourism Geographies: An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment”, nr 4(3), s. 227–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616680210147409

Terkenli T.S. (2011): From Landscape to Tourism and Back: The Emergence of a Greek Landscape Conscience. [w:] Z. Roca, P. Claval i J.A. Agnew (red.): Landscapes, Identities, and Development, Farnham, Surrey–Burlington, VT, Ashgate.

Tucki A. (2009): Potencjal turystyczny regionu lubelskiego. „Annales UMCS. Sectio B. Geographia, Geologia, Mineralogia et Petrographia”, nr 64(1), s. 15–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10066-008-0016-7

van der Duim R. (2007): Tourismscapes — an Actor-Network Perspective. „Annals of Tourism Research”, nr 34(4), s. 961–976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2007.05.008

Włodarczyk B. (2009): Krajobrazy przestrzeni turystycznej. „Turyzm”, nr 19(1/2), s. 89–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/0867-5856.19.1-2.13

Włodarczyk B. (2011): The Tourism Landscape and Tourist Space of the City. [w:] W. Alejziak (red.): Folia Turistica. Special Edition: “The Master Classes” (Published on the 35th Anniversary of the Tourism and Recreation Faculty at the University School of Physical Education in Kraków ). nr 25, Folia Turistica, t. 1, Kraków, Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego im. Bronisława Czecha w Krakowie.

Wojciechowski K.H. (1994): O przydatności badań percepcji krajobrazu. [w:] J. Bogdanowski (red.): O percepcji środowiska. Praca zbiorowa przygotowana w ramach działalności zespołu MAB-13 „Percepcja środowiska”, Zeszyty Naukowe/Polska Akademia Nauk Komitet Naukowy przy Prezydium PAN „Człowiek i Środowisko”, t. 9, Dziekanów Leśny, Instytut Ekologii PAN. Oficyna Wydawnicza.