Metodyka badania nastrojów gospodarczych w województwie lubelskim na tle badań Komisji Europejskiej

Mieczysław Kowerski

doi:10.56583/br.1407

Published : 2010-01-21

No. 3 (17) (2009)

The Methodology of the Economic Sentiment Surveys of the Lubelskie Region in Comparison with the European Commission Surveys

Mieczysław Kowerski

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1407

Abstract

The paper attempts to compare the methodology applied in the economic sentiment surveys of the Lubelskie region (carried out since 2001) with the methodology of the joint harmonized EU program of business and consumer surveys, proposed to the EU members by the Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs. The carried out analysis showed that in spite of some differences in details and conformity, just in an outline with the methodology proposed by the EU, the methodology applied in the economic sentiment surveys of the Lubelskie region gives similar results. The comparison of graphs calculated for the EU and Poland by using the European Commission’s methodology of economic sentiment indicators with the values of diagnostic economic sentiment indicator for the Lubelskie region, shows the large synchronization of changes, especially in the indicator for Poland and the Lubelskie region. The confidence indicators and the economic sentiment indicator calculated for the Lubelskie region are highly correlated with the corresponding indicators for Poland calculated by using the European Commission’s methodology. At the same time, the economic sentiment indicator for the Lubelskie region shows the highest correlation with the indicator for Poland one month lagged. It means that the entrepreneurs and consumers in the region, react to economic changes a month later than it is averagely done in Poland.

Keywords:

the Joint Harmonized EU Programme of Business and Consumer Surveys, Economic Sentiment Indicator, confidence indicators, Lubelskie region

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Mieczysław Kowerski, Review of T. Palmowski’s Kaliningrad — szansa czy zagrożenie dla Europy Bałtyckiej. Monografia społeczno-gospodarcza , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2013)
Mieczysław Kowerski, 10 Years of Economic Sentiment Surveys in Lubelskie Voivodship , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 2 (24) (2011)
Mieczysław Kowerski, Demographic Determinants of the Changes in the Student Population of the Lubelskie Voivodship , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 3 (29) (2012)
Mieczysław Kowerski, Jarosław Bielak, Dawid Długosz, Mariusz Poninkiewicz, Economic Sentiment Changes in the Lubelskie Voivodship in the 2nd Quarter of 2012 , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 3 (29) (2012)
Bogdan Kawałko, Mieczysław Kowerski, Wstęp , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 2 (12) (2008)
Mieczysław Kowerski, Jarosław Bielak, Dawid Długosz, Zmiany nastrojów gospodarczych w województwie lubelskim w I kwartale 2009 r. , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 2 (16) (2009)
Mieczysław Kowerski, Informacje o powiatach i gminach województwa lubelskiego w 2001 roku , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 3 (2003)
Mieczysław Kowerski, Jarosław Bielak, Dawid Długosz, Mariusz Poninkiewicz, Andrzej Salej, Zmiany nastrojów gospodarczych w województwie lubelskim w III kwartale 2012 r. , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2013)
Mieczysław Kowerski, Sprawozdanie z prac zespołu badawczego projektu „System przeciwdziałania powstawaniu bezrobocia na terenach słabo zurbanizowanych” , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 2 (12) (2008)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Kowerski, M. (2010). The Methodology of the Economic Sentiment Surveys of the Lubelskie Region in Comparison with the European Commission Surveys. Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses, (3 (17), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1407

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Adamowicz E. (2008): Dorobek naukowy Instytutu Rozwoju Gospodarczego SGH w latach 1993–2007, „Prace i Materiały Instytutu Rozwoju Gospodarczego SGH”, nr 81, Warszawa.

Badania koniunktury. Koniunktura konsumencka (2009): GUS, Warszawa.

Badania koniunktury. Koniunktura w przemyśle, budownictwie i handlu (2009): GUS, Warszawa.

Bracha Cz. (1998): Metoda reprezentacyjna w badaniu opinii publicznej i marketingu, Efekt, Warszawa.

Business Tendency Surveys: A Handbook (2003): Source OECD, „Transition Economies”, No. 8.

Kowalewski G. (2009): Wartość informacyjna wskaźników koniunktury dla danych jakościowych [w:] J. Garczarczyk (red.), Rynek usług finansowych a koniunktura gospodarcza, CEDEWU.PL, Warszawa 2009.

Kowerski M. (2008): Wartość informacyjna odpowiedzi „bez zmian” w badaniach nastrojów gospodarczych, „Barometr Regionalny” nr 4(14), WSZiA, Zamość. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1461

Kowerski M. (2009): Metodologia badań regionalnych prowadzonych w ramach projektu Lubelski Barometr Gospodarczy, http://lbg.wszia.edu.pl/?p=79.

The Joint Harmonised EU Programme of Business and Consumer Surveys User Guide (26 May 2004): European Commission, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs, Brussels.

The Joint Harmonised EU Programme of Business and Consumer Surveys User Guide (4 July 2007): European Commission, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs, Brussels.