Metodologia konceptualizacji przedmiotów dla systemów z bazą wiedzy na podstawie ontologii formalnej Romana Ingardena

Jan Andreasik

doi:10.56583/br.1369

Published : 2010-07-22

No. 2 (20) (2010)

The Conceptualization of Objects for the Systems with a Knowledge Base (KBS) Based on the Formal Ontology of Roman Ingarden

Jan Andreasik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1369

Abstract

The paper presents the description of knowledge representation in the systems with a knowledge base. It has been founded on Roman Ingarden’s formal ontology. The categories of ontology within the definition of the individual object are introduced. The paper shows the creation procedure for the description of the object that consists of the following: the interpretation of the object's nature – a form, matter, and the way of being; determining the definition of a subject for the object; defining the system for the object's comparative assessment; defining the state of things; determining the constructive nature of the object; describing the legal status of the object. Referring to the semantics of the BWW model (Bunge-Wand-Webber), the article introduced the semantics of the individual subject model for the KBS systems. The introduced approach singles out the way of formulating (acquiring) expert knowledge (form the learning subject). The creation of the procedure is supported by the example of determining the offers of real estate agencies.

Keywords:

Ingarden, ontology, KBS system

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Andreasik, J. (2010). The Conceptualization of Objects for the Systems with a Knowledge Base (KBS) Based on the Formal Ontology of Roman Ingarden. Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses, (2 (20), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1369

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Akerkar R.A., Sajja P.S. (2010): Knowledge-Based Systems. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA, USA.

Andreasik J. (2008): A Case Base Reasoning System for Predicting the Economic Situation on Enterprises – Tacit Knowledge Capture Process (Externalization), [w:] M. Kurzynski et al. (eds.), Computer Recognition Systems 2, AiSC, Vol. 45, s. 718–730, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75175-5_89

Andreasik J. (2009a): Decision Support System for Assessment of Enterprise Competence, [w:] M. Kurzynski, M. Wozniak (red.), Computer Recognition Systems 3, AiSC, Vol. 57, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, s. 559–567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93905-4_65

Andreasik J. (2009b): Enterprise Ontology for Knowledge Based System, [w:] Z. Hippe, J. Kulikowski (red.), Human-Computer Systems Interaction, AiSC, Vol. 60, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, s. 443–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03202-8_35

Andreasik J. (2009c): Enterprise Ontology According to Roman Ingarden Formal Ontology. [w:] K. A. Cyran (eds.): Man-Machine Interactions, AiSC, Vol. 59, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, s. 85–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00563-3_8

Andreasik J. (2009d): The Knowledge Generation about An Enterprise in KBS-AE (Knowledge-Based System – Acts of Explanation), [w:] N.T. Nguyen et al. (red.), New Challenges in Computational Collective Intelligence, SCI 244, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, s. 85–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03958-4_8

Baader F., Calvanese D., McGuinness D., Nardi D., Patel-Schneider P. (2003): The Description Logic Handbook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Chandrasekaran B., Josephson J.R., Benjamins V.R. (1999): What are Ontologies, and Why Do We Need Them?, „IEEE Intelligent Systems”, nr 14(1), s. 20–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.747902

Fonseca F. (2007): The Double Role of Ontologies in Information Science Research, „Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology”, nr 58(6), s. 786–793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20565

Guarino N. (1998): Formal Ontology and Information Systems, [w:] N. Guarino (red.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems, IOS Press, Amsterdam, s. 3–15.

Guarino N., Oberle D., Staab S. (2009): What is an Ontology?, [w:] S. Staab, R. Studer (red.), Handbook on Ontologies, International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, s. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_0

Hitzler P., Krotzsc h M., Rudolph S. (2009): Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies, Chapman & Hall/CRC Textbooks in Computing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420090512

Ingarden R. (1987): Spór o istnienie świata, t. II: Ontologia formalna, cz. 1: Forma i istota, PWN, Warszawa.

Jurisica I., Mylopoulos J., Yu E. (1999): Using Ontologies for Knowledge Management: an Information Systems Perspective, Annual Conference of the American Society for Information Science, Washington, D.C.

Kiwelekar A.W., Joshi R.K. (2007): An Object-oriented Metamodel for Bunge-Wand-Weber Ontology.[w:] In Proc. of SWeCKa 2007, Workshop on Semantic Web for Collaborative Knowledge Acquisition at IJCAI 2007 (January 2007).

Milton S.K., Kazmierczak E. (2004): An Ontology of Data Modeling Languages: a Study Using a Common-sense Realistic Ontology, „Journal of Database Management”, nr 15(2), s. 19–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jdm.2004040102

Nowak A.J., Sosnowski L. (red.) (2001): Słownik pojęć filozoficznych Romana Ingardena, UNIVERSITAS, Kraków.

Mordka A. (2002): Przedmiot i sposób istnienia. Zarys ontologii egzystencjalnej Romana Ingardena, Wyd. UR, Rzeszów.

Noy N., McGuinness D.L. (2001): Ontology Development 101: a Guide to Creating Your First Ontology, http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/KSL_Abstracts/KSL-01-05.html.

Recker J., Niehaves B. (2008): Epistemological Perspectives on Ontology-based Theories for Conceptual Modeling, „Applied Ontology”, nr 3, s. 111–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-2008-0045

Rosiak M. (2003): Spór o substancjalizm. Studia z ontologii Ingardena i metafizyki Whiteheada, Wyd. UŁ, Łódź.

Rosiak M. (2007): Existential Analysis in Roman Ingarden’s Ontology, „Forum Philosophicum”, nr 12, s. 119–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/forphil200712126

Saa ty T.L. (1980): The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Sowa J.F. (1995): Top-level Ontological Categories, International Journal of Human- Computer Studies archive. Vol. 43, Issue 5-6, s. 669–685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1995.1068

Spies A., Roche Ch. (2008): Aristotelian Ontologies and OWL Modeling, [w:] Rittgen P. (red.), Handbook of Ontologies for Business Interaction, Hershey, New York, s. 21–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-660-0.ch002

Stróżewski W. (2006): Ontologia, Znak, Kraków.

Thomasson A.L. (2004): Methods of Categorization, [w:] A.C. Varzi, L.Vieu (red.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems, IOS Press, Amsterdam 2004, s. 3–16.

Wand Y., Weber R. (1990): An Ontological Model of an Information System, “IEEE Transactions of Software Engineering”, Vol. 16, No 11, s. 1282-1292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/32.60316

Woleński J. (2007): Epistemologia, PWN, Warszawa.

Wyssusek B. (2004): Ontology and Ontologies in Information Systems Analysis and Design: a Critique, Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York, s. 4303–4308.