The Architecture of the Intelligent Case-Based Reasoning Recommender System (CBR RS) Recommending Preventive/Corrective Procedures in the Occupational Health and Safety Management System in an Enterprise

Jan Andreasik

doi:10.56583/br.430

Published : 2018-01-12

Vol. 15 No. 3 (2017)

The Architecture of the Intelligent Case-Based Reasoning Recommender System (CBR RS) Recommending Preventive/Corrective Procedures in the Occupational Health and Safety Management System in an Enterprise

Jan Andreasik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.430

Abstract

The paper presents the original architecture of the system recommending preventive/corrective procedures in the occupational health and safety management system in an enterprise: ComplianceOHS-CBR. The system consists of four modules: Module A — an ontology of the workplace OHS profile, Module B — an ontology of preventive/corrective procedure indexation OPCPI, Module C — a recording system of the monitoring process of non-compliance with the requirements of OHS, Module D — a recommending engine consistent with the CBR methodology. The essence of the approach presented in this paper is integration of the monitoring system of the analysis process of non-compliance with the requirements of OHS at the workplace (the ADONIS system was used) with the case-based reasoning process (CBR). The integration platform consists of two ontologies: an ontology of profile compliance with the workplace OHS requirements (OP-OHS) and an ontology of preventive/corrective procedure indexation (OPCPI). Both of the ontologies are presented in the Protege 5 OWL editor. Inference engines are alternatively, according to the CBR methodology, myCBR and jCOLLIBRI.

Keywords:

recommender system, Case-Based Reasoning (CBR), OHS, monitoring process of non-compliance OHS, ontology of profile compliance OHS, OWL, Protege, ADONIS, myCBR, jCOLLIBRI

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Andreasik, J. (2018). The Architecture of the Intelligent Case-Based Reasoning Recommender System (CBR RS) Recommending Preventive/Corrective Procedures in the Occupational Health and Safety Management System in an Enterprise. Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses, 15(3), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.56583/br.430

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Aamodt, A., and E. Plaza. 1994. “Case-Based Reasoning — Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches.” Ai Communications 7 (1): 39–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-1994-7104

Amailef, K., and J. Lu. 2013. “Ontology-Supported Case-Based Reasoning Approach for Intelligent m-Government Emergency Response Services.” Decision Support Systems 55 (1): 79–97. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.034

Andreasik, J. 2015. “Koncepcja ontologii systemu bezpieczeństwa i higieny pracy.” Barometr Regionalny. Analizy i Prognozy 13 (3): 179–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.748

Bergmann, R., J. Kolodner, and E. Plaza. 2005. “Representation in Case-Based Reasoning.” Knowledge Engineering Review 20 (3): 209–213. doi: 10.1017/S0269888906000555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888906000555

Bobadilla, J., F. Ortega, A. Hernando, and A. Gutierrez. 2013. “Recommender Systems Survey.” Knowledge-Based Systems 46: 109–132. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.03.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.03.012

Dendani-Hadiby, N., and M.T. Khadir. 2013. “A Fault Diagnosis Application Based on a Combination Case-Based Reasoning and Ontology Approach.” International Journal of Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Engineering Systems 17 (4): 305–317. doi: 10.3233/KES-130280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/KES-130280

Dietz, J.L.G. 2006. Enterprise Ontology. Theory and Methodology. Berlin – New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33149-2

El-Sappagh, S.H., and M. Elmogy. 2015. “Case Based Reasoning: Case Representation Methodologies.” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 6 (11): 192–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2015.061126

Gawin, B., and B. Marcinkowski. 2013. Symulacja procesów biznesowych. Standardy BPMS i BPMN w praktyce, Onepress. Gliwice: Helion.

Hinkelmann, K., A. Gerber, D. Karagiannis, B. Thoenssen, A. van der Merwe, and R. Woitsch. 2016. “A New Paradigm for the Continuous Alignment of Business and IT: Combining Enterprise Architecture Modelling and Enterprise Ontology.” Computers in Industry 79: 77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.07.009

Kaplan, R.S., and D.P. Norton. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard. Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

Lu, J., D.S. Wu, M.S. Mao, W. Wang, and G.Q. Zhang. 2015. “Recommender System Application Developments: a Survey.” Decision Support Systems 74: 12–32. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2015.03.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.03.008

Lu, Y., Q.M. Li, and W.J. Xiao. 2013. “Case-Based Reasoning for Automated Safety Risk Analysis on Subway Operation: Case Representation and Retrieval.” Safety Science 57: 75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.020

Ly, L.T., F.M. Maggi, M. Montali, S. Rinderle-Ma, and W.M.P. van der Aalst. 2015. “Compliance Monitoring in Business Processes: Functionalities, Application, and Tool-Support.” Information Systems 54: 209–234. doi: 10.1016/j.is.2015.02.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2015.02.007

Rao, S.S., and A. Nayak. 2017. “Enterprise Ontology Model for Tacit Knowledge Externalization in Socio-Technical Enterprises.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management 12: 99–124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/3680

Recio-Garcia, J.A., P.A. Gonzalez-Calero, and B. Diaz-Agudo. 2014. “jCOLIBRI2: A Framework for Building Case-Based Reasoning Systems.” Science of Computer Programming 79: 126–145. doi: 10.1016/j.scico.2012.04.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2012.04.002

Rintala, L., M. Leikola, C. Sauer, J. Aromaa, T. Roth-Berghofer, O. Forsen, and M. Lundstrom. 2017. “Designing Gold Extraction Processes: Performance Study of a Case-Based Reasoning System.” Minerals Engineering 109: 42–53. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2017.02.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2017.02.013

Saracino, A., G. Antonioni, G. Spadoni, D. Guglielmi, E. Dottori, L. Flamigni, M. Malagoli, and V. Pacini. 2015. “Quantitative Assessment of Occupational Safety and Health: Application of a General Methodology to an Italian Multi-Utility Company.” Safety Science 72: 75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.08.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.08.007

Sauer, C. 2016. Knowledge Elicitation and Formalisation for Context and Explanation-Aware Computing with Case-Based Recommender Systems. Doctoral thesis, University of West London, London.

Sauer, C., A. Kheirkhahzadeh, and T. Roth-Berghofer. 2016. Data Literacy in the Smart University Approach. Paper read at Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference 2016, 2016.04.26, at Edinburgh, UK.

Seck, M., and J. Barjis. 2015. “An Agent Based Approach for Simulating DEMO Enterprise Models.” Complex Adaptive Systems, 2015 61: 246–253. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.206

Teimourikia, M., and M. Fugini. 2017. “Ontology Development for Run-Time Safety Management Methodology in Smart Work Environments Using Ambient Knowledge.” Future Generation Computer Systems — the International Journal of Escience 68: 428–441. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2016.07.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.07.003

Virkki-Hatakka, T., and G.L.L. Reniers. 2009. “A Case-Based Reasoning Safety Decision-Support Tool: Nextcase/Safety.” Expert Systems with Applications 36 (7): 10374–10380. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.059

Yahia, Z., J. Iijima, N.A. Harraz, and A.B. Eltawil. 2017. “A Design and Engineering Methodology for Organization-Based Simulation Model for Operating Room Scheduling Problems.” Simulation-Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International 93 (5): 363–378. doi: 10.1177/0037549716687376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549716687376