Knowledge-Based System for Assessment of Economic Situation of Enterprise

Jan Andreasik

doi:10.56583/br.1086

Data publikacji : 2014-06-09

Tom 12 Nr 1 (2014)

System z bazą wiedzy do oceny kondycji ekonomicznej przedsiębiorstwa

Jan Andreasik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1086

Abstrakt

W pracy przedstawiono architekturę systemu z bazą wiedzy, którego zadaniem jest ocena ekonomicznej kondycji przedsiębiorstwa. Baza wiedzy została skonstruowana w oparciu o ontologię A-E-AE (Agent-Ekspert-Akty Wyjaśniania). Przedstawiono diagram klas w edytorze języka OWL — Protege. Strukturę procesu wyjaśniania oceny ekonomicznej sytuacji przedsiębiorstwa przedstawiono na diagramie UML. Proces rozpoznawania w systemie jest oparty na metodologii CBR (Case-Based Reasoning) — wnioskowanie poprzez analogię z bazy przypadków.

Słowa kluczowe:

ontologia przedsiębiorstwa, ontologia A-E-AE, system z bazą wiedzy, język OWL, diagram klas Protege, ocena kondycji przedsiębiorstwa

Inne teksty tego samego autora

1 2 3 > >>

Szczegóły

Bibliografia

Statystyki

Autorzy

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Andreasik, J. (2014). System z bazą wiedzy do oceny kondycji ekonomicznej przedsiębiorstwa. Barometr Regionalny. Analizy I Prognozy, 12(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1086

Wskaźniki altmetryczne

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Aamodt, A., and E. Plaza. 1994. “Case-Based Reasoning — Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches.” Ai Communications no. 7 (1): 39–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-1994-7104

Altman, E.I. 1993. Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy. A Complete Guide to Predicting & Avoiding Distress and Profiting from Bankruptcy. 2 ed, Wiley finance editions. New York: Wiley.

Andreasik, J. 2007. “A Case Base Reasoning System for Predicting the Economic Situation on Enterprises – Tacit Knowledge Capture Process (Externalization).” In Computer recognition systems 2, edited by M. Kurzyński, 718–730. Berlin-New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75175-5_89

Andreasik, J. 2008. “Enterprise Ontology — Diagnostic Approach.” 2008 Conference on Human System Interactions, Vols 1 and 2:503–509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2008.4581489

Argenti, J. 1976. Corporate Collapse. The Causes and Symptoms. London-New York: McGraw-Hill.

Brooking, A. 1999. Corporate Memory. Strategies for Knowledge Management. London: International Thomson Business Press.

Carlucci, D., B. Marr, and G. Schiuma. 2004. “The Knowledge Value Chain. How Intellectual Capital Impacts on Business Performance.” International Journal of Technology Management no. 27 (6–7): 575–590. doi: 10.1504/Ijtm.2004.004903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2004.004903

Forman, E.H., and M.A. Selly. 2001. Decision by Objectives. How to Convince Others That You Are Right. River Edge, N. J.: World Scientific. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/4281

Harzallah, M., G. Berio, and F. Vernadat. 2006. “Analysis and Modeling of Individual Competencies. Toward Better Management of Human Resources.” Ieee Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part a-Systems and Humans no. 36 (1): 187–207. doi: 10.1109/Tsmca.2006.859093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2005.859093

Holsapple, C.W., and M. Singh. 2001. “The Knowledge Chain Model. Activities for Competitiveness.” Expert Systems with Applications no. 20 (1): 77–98. doi: 10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00050-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00050-6

Jussupova-Mariethoz, Y., and A.R. Probst. 2007. “Business Concepts Ontology for an Enterprise Performance and Competences Monitoring.” Computers in Industry no. 58 (2): 118–129. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.008

Kirkwood, C.W. 1997. Strategic Decision Making. Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets. Belmont: Duxbury Press.

Lu, J., L. Sun, and X. Ma. 2002. “An Evaluation Model for Enterprise Competence and Case Study.” USA-China Business Review no. 2 (2).

Montresor, S. 2004. “Resources, Capabilities, Competences and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Economic Studies no. 31 (5): 409–434. doi: 10.1108/01443580410555528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580410555528

Pepiot, G., N. Cheikhrouhou, J.M. Furbringer, and R. Glardon. 2007. “UECML: Unified Enterprise Competence Modelling Language.” Computers in Industry no. 58 (2): 130–142. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.010

Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive Strategy. Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.

Prahalad, C.K., and G. Hamel. 1990. “The Core Competence of the Corporation.” Harvard Business Review no. 68 (3): 79–91.

Richardson, B., S. Nwankwo, and S. Richardson. 1994. “Understanding the Causes of Business Failure Crises. Generic Failure Types: Boiled Frogs, Drowned Frogs, Bullfrogs and Tadpoles.” Management Decision no. 32 (4): 9–22. doi: 10.1108/00251749410058635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749410058635

Saaty, T.L. 2001. Decision Making for Leaders. The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. The analytic hierarchy process series. Pittsburgh, Pa.: RWS Publ. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2

Seppänen, V. 2002. “Evolution of Competence in Software Subcontracting Projects.” International Journal of Project Management no. 20 (2): 155–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00043-0

Vasconcelos, J.A.B., C. Kimble, F.R. Gouveia, and D. Kudenko. 2001. Reasoning in Corporate Memory Systems. A Case Study of Group Competencies. Paper read at ISMICK’01, October, at Université Technologie Compiègne.

Watson, I.D. 2003. Applying Knowledge Management. Techniques for Building Corporate Memories. Amsterdam-Boston: Morgan Kaufmann. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46119-1_2