Ontologia przedsiębiorstwa według teorii przedmiotu Romana Ingardena

Jan Andreasik

doi:10.56583/br.1419

Published : 2009-04-06

No. 1 (15) (2009)

Enterprise Ontology According to Roman Ingarden’s Theory of Objects

Jan Andreasik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1419

Abstract

In the paper, original ontology is defined. This ontology is based on the concept apparatus of theory of object proposed by Roman Ingarden - a Polish philosopher. In Section 2, the author presents a definition of individual object according to this theory. In this definition, the following concepts are included: essence, form, way of existence, constitutive nature, subject of properties, endowment of properties, properties, state of thing, relation. By analogy, the author defines one's own concepts of the enterprise ontology: enterprise essence, form of competence system, content of assessments, enterprise vision, enterprise competence system, competence assessment, assessment criteria, score trajectories, grammar of trajectories, enterprise condition, competence potential condition, competence gap condition, act of explanation. According to the presented enterprise ontology, there are created descriptions of cases in the intelligent system for recognition of enterprise condition designed on the basis of the CBR (Case-Based Reasoning) methodology.

Keywords:

ontology, enterprise, Roman Ingarden’s formal ontology

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>

Similar Articles

Jan Andreasik, Ontology of Information about an Enterprise Found in Press Articles , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2014)

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Andreasik, J. (2009). Enterprise Ontology According to Roman Ingarden’s Theory of Objects. Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses, (1 (15), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1419

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Altman E.I. (1993): Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York.

Andreasik J. (2007): A Case Base Reasoning System for Predicting the Economic Situation on Enterprises – Tacit Knowledge Capture Process (Externalization), [w:] Computer Recognition Systems 2, red. M. Kurzynski et al., ASC 45, Berlin Heidelbery, s. 718-730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75175-5_89

Andreasik J. (2008a): Enterprise Ontology – Diagnostic Approach. Proceedings of the Conference on Human System Interaction (HIS`2008), Kraków, s. 497-503, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2008.4581489

Andreasik J. (2008b): Inteligent System for Predicting Economic Situation of SME, 14th International Congress of Cybernetics and Systems of WOSC, Proceedings 14 th ICCS, red. J. Józefczyk, W. Thomas, M. Turowska, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław.

Andreasik J. (2009): Decision Support System for Assessment of Enterprise Competence. CORES`09 6th International Conference on Computer recognition Systems (w druku). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-93905-4_65

Argenti J. (1976): Corporate Collapse. The Causes and Symptoms, Mc Graw-Hill, London.

Bocheński J.M. (1993): Przyczynek do filozofii przedsiębiorstwa przemysłowego. Logika i filozofia. Wybór pism, PWN, Warszawa, s. 162-186.

Carlucci D., Schiuma G. (2007): Knowledge Assets Value Creation Map Assessing Knowledge Assets Value Drivers Using AHP, Expert Systems with Applications 32, s. 814-821. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.046

Choo C.w., Bontis N. (2002): The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, Oxford University Press.

Dietz J.L.G. (2006): Enterprise Ontology, Springer, Berlin Heidelbery. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33149-2

Dunn C., Cherrington J.o., Hollander A.s. (2003): Enterprise Information Systems. A Pattern-Based Approach, McGraw-Hill, Boston.

Ertugrul I., Karakasoglu N. (2009): Performance Evaluation of Turkisch Cement Firms with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS Methods, Expert Systems with Applications 36, s. 702-715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.014

Gruninger M., Atefi K., Fox M.S. (2000): Ontologies to Support Process Integration in Enterprise Engineering, Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 6, s. 381-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009610430261

Hamel G., Prahalad C.K. (1994): Competing for the Future, Harvard Business School Press.

Harzallah M., Berio G., Vernadat F. (2006): Analysis and Modeling of Individual Competencies: Toward Better Management of Human Resources, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 36, no. 1, s. 187-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2005.859093

Huang H.c. (2009): Designing a knowledge-based system for strategic planning: A balanced scorecard perspective, Expert Systems with Applications 36, s. 209-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.09.046

Ingarden R. (1987): Spór o istnienie świata, t. II: Ontologia formalna, cz. I: Forma i istota, PWN, Warszawa.

Jussupova-Mariethoz Y., Probst A.R. (2007): Business Concepts Ontology for an Enterprise Performance and Competences Monitoring, Computers in Industry 58, s. 118-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.008

Lee A.h., Chen W.c., Chang C.J. (2008): A Fuzzy AHP and BSC Approach for Evaluating Performance of IT Department in Manufacturing Industry in Taiwan, Expert Systems with Applications 34, s. 96-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022

Li H., Sun J. (2008): Ranking-Order Case-Based Reasoning for Financial Distress Prediction, Knowledge-Based Systems 21, s. 868-878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2008.03.047

Lin M.c., Wang C.c., Chen M.s., Chang C.A. (2008): Using AHP and TOPSIS Approaches in Customer-Driven Product Design Process, Computers in Industry 59, s. 17-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2007.05.013

Łoboda K., Krupa M., Wargacki M., Długosz D. (2007): E-barometr. Manual – How To Use It, http://www.wszia.edu.pl/eng/files/e-barometr-manual.pdf.

Pal S.k., Shiu S.C.K. (2004): Foundations of Soft Case-Based Reasoning, Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken New Jersey. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471644676

Pepiot G., Cheikhrouhou N., Furbringer J.m., Glardon R. (2007): UECML: Unified Enterprise Competence Modeling Language, Computers in Industry 58, s. 130-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.010

Richardson B., Nwankwo S., Richardson S. (1994): Understanding the Causes of Business Failure Crises: Generic Failure Types: Boiled Frogs, Drowned Frogs, Bullfrogs And Tadpoles, Management Decision, vol. 32, no. 4, s. 9-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749410058635

Rittgen P. (2008): Handbook of Ontologies for Business Interaction, Information Science Reference, Hershey, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-660-0

Saaty T.L. (2001): Decision Making for Leaders, RWS Publications, University of Pittsburg.

Thomaidis F., Mavrakis D. (2006): Optimum Route of South Transcontinental Gas Pipeline in SE Europe Using AHP, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 14, s. 77-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.402

Wen W., Chen Y.h., Chen I.C. (2008): A Knowledge-Based Decision Support System for Measuring Enterprises Performance, Knowledge-Based Systems 21, s. 148-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2007.05.009

Wojtysiak J. (2007): Filozofia i życie, Znak, Kraków.

Zopounidis C., Dimitras A.I. (1998): Multicriteria Decision Aid Methods for the Prediction of Business Failure, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2885-9