Ocena strategii kompetencyjności firmy sektora MŚP w systemie SOK-P1

Jan Andreasik

doi:10.56583/br.1460

Published : 2008-10-10

No. 4 (14) (2008)

A Competence Strategy Assessment of the SME Sector Enterprises (in the SOK-P1 System)

Jan Andreasik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1460

Abstract

In the paper, an original author’s approach to analysis of competitive position of an enterprise of the SME sector is presented. A model of a competence strategy assessment of an enterprise is constructed in five spaces: capital potential - risk of the financial activity, innovation and investment potential - risk of the investment and innovation projects, key stakeholder potential - risk of the stakeholder service, neighborhood relationship potential - neighborhood relationship risk, environment relationship potential - environment relationship risk. In the learning process by means of the EUCLID and ELECTRE TRI methods, four classes of the enterprise position were determined: A1: low potential, high risk, A2: high potential, high risk, A3: high potential, low risk, A4: low potential, low risk. In the paper, results of classification of 220 enterprises from Podkarpackie and Lubelskie voivodships are depicted.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Jan Andreasik, Andrzej Ciebiera, Sławomir Umpirowicz, ControlSem – Distributed Decision Support System Based on Semantic Web Technologies for the Analysis of the Medical Procedures , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 3 (21) (2010)
Jan Andreasik, „System przeciwdziałania powstawaniu bezrobocia na terenach słabo zurbanizowanych” - misja projektu , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 5 (2006)
Jan Andreasik, System oceny kondycji przedsiębiorstwa z wykorzystaniem metod wielokryterialnego podejmowania decyzji , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 6 (2006)
Jan Andreasik, Identyfikacja problemów w strategicznym zarządzaniu projektem , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 5 (2006)
Jan Andreasik, [Szanowni Państwo] , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 4 (2005)
Jan Andreasik, [Szanowni Państwo] , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 2 (8) (2007)
Jan Andreasik, [Szanowni Czytelnicy] , Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses: No. 2 (2002)

<< < 1 2 3

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Andreasik, J. (2008). A Competence Strategy Assessment of the SME Sector Enterprises (in the SOK-P1 System). Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses, (4 (14), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1460

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Bartnicki M. 2000: Kompetencje przedsiębiorstwa. Agencja Wydawnicza PLACED, Warszawa.

Becker B.E., Huselid M.A., Ulrich D. 2004: The HR scorecard. Harvard Business School Press.

Brooking A. 1999: Corporate memory. International Thomson Business Press.

Corner K.R., Prahalad C.K. 2002: A Resorce-Based Theory of the Firm. Knowledge versus Opportunism. [w:] The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, (eds.) Chun Wei Choo, Nick Bontis, Oxford University Press, pp. 103–131.

Forman E.H., Selly M.A. 2001: Decision by objectives, World Scientific. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/4281

Hamel G., Prahalad C.K. 1999: Przewaga konkurencyjna jutra. Business Press, Warszawa.

Harzallah M., Berio G., Vernadat F. 2006: Analysis and modeling of individual competencies: toward better management of human resources. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 36, no. 1, pp.187–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2005.859093

Huang C.C., Tseng T.L., Kusiak A. 2005: XML – Based Modeling of Corporate Memory. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 629–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2005.843391

Lee Y.T., Wu W.W. 2005: Development strategies for competency models. Joint Conference between Taiwan and Japan on Academic Research in Management, 1–11, Japan: Kobei.

Li Y., Huang B., Liu W., Gou H., Wu C. 2001: Ontology for modeling and analyzing of enterprise competence. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, IEEE International Conference on, vol. 5, pp. 2941–2946.

Lu J., Sun L., Ma X. 2002: An evaluation model for enterprise competence and case study. USA-China Business Review, New York City, vol. 2, no. 2, serial no. 3.

Montresor S. 2004: Resources, capabilities, competences and the theory of the fi rm. Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 409–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580410555528

Pepiot G., Cheikhrouhou N., Furbringer J.M., Glardon R. 2007: UECML: Unified Enterprise Competence Modeling Language. Computers in Industry, 58, pp. 130–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.010

Prahalad C.K., Hamel G. 1990: The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, vol. 66. pp. 79–91.

Rampersad H.K. 2004: Kompleksowa karta wyników, Wydawnictwo PLACED.

Saaty T.L. 2001: Decision Making for Leaders. RWS Publications.

Seppanen V. 2002: Evolution of competence in software subcontracting projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20, pp. 155–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00043-0

Sussupova-Mariethoz Y., Probst A.R. 2007: Bussines Concepts Ontology for an Enterprise Performance and Competences Monitoring. Computers in Industry, 58, pp. 118–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.008