Ocena strategii kompetencyjności firmy sektora MŚP w systemie SOK-P1

Jan Andreasik

doi:10.56583/br.1460

Published : 2008-10-10

No. 4 (14) (2008)

A Competence Strategy Assessment of the SME Sector Enterprises (in the SOK-P1 System)

Jan Andreasik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1460

Abstract

In the paper, an original author’s approach to analysis of competitive position of an enterprise of the SME sector is presented. A model of a competence strategy assessment of an enterprise is constructed in five spaces: capital potential - risk of the financial activity, innovation and investment potential - risk of the investment and innovation projects, key stakeholder potential - risk of the stakeholder service, neighborhood relationship potential - neighborhood relationship risk, environment relationship potential - environment relationship risk. In the learning process by means of the EUCLID and ELECTRE TRI methods, four classes of the enterprise position were determined: A1: low potential, high risk, A2: high potential, high risk, A3: high potential, low risk, A4: low potential, low risk. In the paper, results of classification of 220 enterprises from Podkarpackie and Lubelskie voivodships are depicted.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Andreasik, J. (2008). A Competence Strategy Assessment of the SME Sector Enterprises (in the SOK-P1 System). Regional Barometer. Analyses & Prognoses, (4 (14), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.56583/br.1460

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Bartnicki M. 2000: Kompetencje przedsiębiorstwa. Agencja Wydawnicza PLACED, Warszawa.

Becker B.E., Huselid M.A., Ulrich D. 2004: The HR scorecard. Harvard Business School Press.

Brooking A. 1999: Corporate memory. International Thomson Business Press.

Corner K.R., Prahalad C.K. 2002: A Resorce-Based Theory of the Firm. Knowledge versus Opportunism. [w:] The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, (eds.) Chun Wei Choo, Nick Bontis, Oxford University Press, pp. 103–131.

Forman E.H., Selly M.A. 2001: Decision by objectives, World Scientific. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/4281

Hamel G., Prahalad C.K. 1999: Przewaga konkurencyjna jutra. Business Press, Warszawa.

Harzallah M., Berio G., Vernadat F. 2006: Analysis and modeling of individual competencies: toward better management of human resources. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 36, no. 1, pp.187–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2005.859093

Huang C.C., Tseng T.L., Kusiak A. 2005: XML – Based Modeling of Corporate Memory. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 629–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2005.843391

Lee Y.T., Wu W.W. 2005: Development strategies for competency models. Joint Conference between Taiwan and Japan on Academic Research in Management, 1–11, Japan: Kobei.

Li Y., Huang B., Liu W., Gou H., Wu C. 2001: Ontology for modeling and analyzing of enterprise competence. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, IEEE International Conference on, vol. 5, pp. 2941–2946.

Lu J., Sun L., Ma X. 2002: An evaluation model for enterprise competence and case study. USA-China Business Review, New York City, vol. 2, no. 2, serial no. 3.

Montresor S. 2004: Resources, capabilities, competences and the theory of the fi rm. Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 409–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580410555528

Pepiot G., Cheikhrouhou N., Furbringer J.M., Glardon R. 2007: UECML: Unified Enterprise Competence Modeling Language. Computers in Industry, 58, pp. 130–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.010

Prahalad C.K., Hamel G. 1990: The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, vol. 66. pp. 79–91.

Rampersad H.K. 2004: Kompleksowa karta wyników, Wydawnictwo PLACED.

Saaty T.L. 2001: Decision Making for Leaders. RWS Publications.

Seppanen V. 2002: Evolution of competence in software subcontracting projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20, pp. 155–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00043-0

Sussupova-Mariethoz Y., Probst A.R. 2007: Bussines Concepts Ontology for an Enterprise Performance and Competences Monitoring. Computers in Industry, 58, pp. 118–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2006.09.008