Progres, rebelia czy styl-karykatura? Postmodernizm w estetyce projektowania jako synonim wolności artystycznej na podstawie wybranych manifestów

Anna Wiśnicka

doi:10.56583/fs.2645

Published : 2024-12-31

Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024)

Progress, Rebellion, or Caricatures of the Recent Past? Postmodernism in Design Aesthetics as a Synonym for Artistic Liberation Based on Selected Manifestos

Anna Wiśnicka

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-529X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56583/fs.2645

Abstract

The article, based on a comparative analysis, attempts to explore the narrative of postmodernism’s manifestos, through the lens of libertarian demands declaring the need to diverge from the established practices of the Modern era. Examples discussed in the text include British think tank Archigram and Italian collectives Archizoom Associati and Studio Alchimia, as well as Memphis Milano and the design philosophy of the brand Alessi. Through a critical examination of the writing and direct accounts of postmodern designers, it becomes possible to observe the shifting public sentiment towards the status quo established by Modernism and the need to re-establish a stylistic pluralism that does not reject the historical legacy, creatively deriving from it instead.

Keywords:

postmodernism, design, radical design, postmodern aesthetics, manifesto

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Wiśnicka, A. (2024). Progress, Rebellion, or Caricatures of the Recent Past? Postmodernism in Design Aesthetics as a Synonym for Artistic Liberation Based on Selected Manifestos. Facta Simonidis, 17(2), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.56583/fs.2645

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Alessi A., The Dream Factory. Alessi since 1921, Milan 2016.

Castillo G., Cold War on the Home Front: The Soft Power of Midcentury Design, Minneapolis, MN-London 2010.

Collins M., Towards Post-modernism. Design since 1851, London 1994.

Conrads U. (ed.), Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture, Cambridge, MA 1975.

Daniel R.M., Herman Miller’s Action Office: Corporate Interiors in the Cold War, „Interiors: Design”, 6 (2015), no. 1, s. 5-20, https://doi.org/10.2752/204191115X14218559960114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2752/204191115X14218559960114

Doesburg T. van i in., De Stijl Manifesto, „De Stijl”, 2 (1918), nr. 1, s. 4.

Eco U., Dopiski na marginesie Imienia róży, w: tegoż, Imię róży, tłum. A. Szymanowski, Warszawa 1996, s. 593-623.

Friedman A.T., Women and the Making of the Modern House: A Social and Architectural History, New Haven, CT-London 2006.

Giacobbi S., Franco Fornari’s Theoretical Thought: Psychoanalytic Research and Its Proposals of Reconciliation and Integration of Nurture with Nature, „Sigmund Freud House Bulletin”, 11 (1987), no. 1, s. 35-41.

Gropius W., Pełnia architektury, tłum. K. Kopczyńska, Kraków 2014.

Ingels B., Yes is More: An Archicomic on Architectural Evolution, Berlin 2009.

Jameson F., Postmodernism and Consumer Society, in: Modernism/Postmodernism, ed. P. Brooker, London 2014, s. 163-179.

Jarczewski A., Yes Is More Comics as an Architectural Manifesto, „Architectus”, 2021, no. 2(66), s. 105-112, http://dx.doi.org/10.37190/arc210211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37190/arc210211

Keedy J., Modernizm żywych trupów, tłum. D. Żukowski, w: Widzieć/Wiedzieć. Wybór najważniejszych tekstów o dizajnie, red. P. Dębowski, J. Mrowczyk, Kraków 2011, s. 141-159.

Keyser S.J., The Mental Life of Modernism, Cambridge, MA-Londyn 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11966.001.0001

Le Corbusier, W stronę architektury, tłum. T. Swoboda, Warszawa 2012.

Lee S., Architecture in the Age of Mediatizing Technologies, New York 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003200567

Lin M., Hsu Y., Exploring Emotional Responses on Empathic Objects, in: Futureground – Design Research Society International Conference 2004, 17-21 November, Melbourne, Australia, eds. J. Redmond, D. Durling, A. de Bono, Melbourne 2004, s. 143-154.

Mendini A., Manifesto di Alchimia, Mediolan 1985, www.ateliermendini.it/index.php?mact=News,cntnt01,print,0&cntnt01articleid=240&cntnt01showtemplate=false&cntnt01lang=en_US&cntnt01returnid=186 [dostęp: 14.11.2024].

Moliterno G. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Contemporary Italian Culture, London 2000.

Neutra R., Survival through Design, New York 1954.

Powers A., Bauhaus Goes West: Modern Art. And Design in Britain and America, London 2019.

Puente M. (ed.), Conversations with Mies van der Rohe, New York 2008.

Radice B. (ed.), Elogio del banale, Torino-Milano 1980.

Sadler S., Archigram: Architecture without Architecture, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 2005.

Strauss C., Radical: Italian Design 1965-1985: The Dennis Freedman Collection, New Haven, CT-London 2020.

Sullivan L.H., The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered, „Lippincott’s Magazine”, 57 (March 1896), s. 403-409.

Ventura J., Shvo G., Breaking the Language of Design: Semioclastics in the World of Industrial Design, „International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation”, 4 (2015), issue 3-4, s. 222--233, https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2015.1026942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2015.1026942

Vignelli M., Niech żyje modernizm!, tłum. K. Szymaniak, A. Puchejda, w: Widzieć/Wiedzieć. Wybór najważniejszych tekstów o dizajnie, red. P. Dębowski, J. Mrowczyk, Kraków 2011, s. 109-113.

Winnicott D.W., The Use of an Object, „International Journal of Psychoanalysis”, 50 (1969), no. 4, s. 711-716.

Wright F.L., Architektura nowoczesna. Wykłady, tłum. D. Żukowski, Kraków 2015.

Yang Y., Xie Z., The Rebellious Journey: Archizoom Associati and Andrea Branzi, “IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering”, 573 (2019), no. 1, 012077, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/573/1/012077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/573/1/012077