The text analyses the pluralism of contemporary literary theories and asks whether claims to truth are relevant when choosing a theory of interpretation. The author shows that although the multiplicity of approaches is sometimes considered an advantage, it raises the problem of interpretative validity, particularly evident in Jungian criticism, which makes strong metaphysical claims to truth. By juxtaposing Jungianism with relativistic positions (e.g., neopragmatism), the text points to the tension between theories that require belief in their ontological assumptions and those that treat interpretation as a rhetorical strategy. The author rejects a methodological resolution of this dispute and proposes the perspective of Heidegger and Gadamer’s ontological hermeneutics. In its light, the choice of theory does not result from an objective assessment of truth, but from the prior structure of understanding and belief inscribed in the hermeneutic circle.
Citation rules
Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.